Kelli and Celia still need a Tony!!

Congrats Jason Robert Brown, Sophie Okonedo, Neil Patrick Harris, and of course Queen Mueller!!


I ramble, rant, rave, and fangirl!


I also occasionally break out into song and dance ;)

I close my eyes, I believe, and suddenly I am so enough

22nd September 2014

Post reblogged from Well Fuck Me Gently With A Chainsaw with 2,224 notes

Reblog this if you think that Pansexuality is real.

killmygalaxy:

thebanditcat:

I know I only have a few followers, but let’s prove my mum wrong, shall we?

Pansexual on board and reporting

Source: thebanditcat

21st September 2014

Photoset reblogged from Well Fuck Me Gently With A Chainsaw with 36,736 notes

marauders4evr:

dont-just-go-pink:

October is the awareness month for every single one of these!

Don’t just go pink!

SIGNAL BOOST!

Signal boost like there’s no tomorrow!

I have faith in you tumblr!

We can raise awareness for the awarenesses!

We can do this!

Source: dont-just-go-pink

20th September 2014

Photo reblogged from Marxism-Leninism-Maoism (Third Worldism) with 118 notes

Source: rosaluxmemeburg

19th September 2014

Photoset reblogged from Well Fuck Me Gently With A Chainsaw with 458,136 notes

slytherinsnow:

ppgfreak85:

One of the BEST ad campaigns about representation I have seen.

Everyone has a backbone. Use yours.

idc what your side of feminism or lgbt agenda is, this is what everyone should agree with.

Source: mecasa.org

18th September 2014

Photoset reblogged from Operafantomet: phantoming with 43 notes

operafantomet:

Candid Meg-as-Gypsy photos. Cause Megs knows how to rock this costume.  

1. Jennifer Wagstaffe, Copenhagen. 
2. Candela Zapata, u/s in Buenos Aires. 
3. Karin Seyfried, Vienna. 
4. Sarah Daurie, Toronto. 
5. Elisa Heinsohn, Broadway. 
6. Janet Devenish, West End. 
7. Brianne Kelly Morgan, Las Vegas. 
8. Layla Harrison, u/s in West End (+Wendy Ferguson). 

Just to let you know, for some reason there are only 8 Megs listed but 9 are shown, also the 3rd Meg is Paloma Garcia Lee

18th September 2014

Photoset reblogged from Well Fuck Me Gently With A Chainsaw with 82,861 notes

bethosaurus:

sadim0uto:

sadim0uto:

sadim0uto:

Hello!! I’m in need of a HUGE signal boost right now (and maybe a big reporting session) because my best friend is being blackmailed by her ex boyfriend. 

I’m not exactly sure what I’m supposed to put here, but I feel like this should be a warning for anyone who knows him and just a general informative thing. Jacob lives in Australia and is 16 years of age. They’ve had a very unhealthy relationship and he’s threatened sending out her nudes multiple times. Jacob is very manipulative and emotionally abusive towards her and even ends up pulling me and her other friends into not being able to do anything because it’ll end up hurting her. He’s made around 7 Twitter accounts to contact my friend in the times that she was trying to get out of the relationship.

In the picture above, he’s posted her nudes and threatened her.

ALL IM ASKING IS FOR YOU TO REPORT HIM ON EVERYTHING AND ANYTHING:

His Twitter accounts all start with @/neinthousand but the one that was most recently used was: @/neinthousand12 (but it was apparently deleted)

His Facebook account is:Jacob R Hynes, and he has more but I am unable to find them. They’re under Jacob Hynes and the like.

********** UPDATES!!! **********

First, we thought we had a compromise. 

Then this happened not even a minute after:

PLEASE CONTINUE REBLOGGING THIS. My friend is only 15 years of age and this is absolutely horrible. We’re getting ahold of local authorities but if you see the pictures anywhere (namely twitter) REPORT THEM IMMEDIATELY.

He’s posting her nudes on this site (so far that we know of) does anyone know what site this is? If so, please inbox me.

update

18th September 2014

Photoset reblogged from Well Fuck Me Gently With A Chainsaw with 1,201 notes

“Screw writing “strong” women. Write interesting women. Write well-rounded women. Write complicated women. Write a woman who kicks ass, write a woman who cowers in a corner. Write a woman who’s desperate for a husband. Write a woman who doesn’t need a man. Write women who cry, women who rant, women who are shy, women who don’t take no shit, women who need validation and women who don’t care what anybody thinks. THEY ARE ALL OKAY, and all those things could exist in THE SAME WOMAN. Women shouldn’t be valued because we are strong, or kick-ass, but because we are people. So don’t focus on writing characters who are strong. Write characters who are people.” – Lori

Source: daniisbookshelf

15th September 2014

Post with 2 notes

hey guys does hpphans (MeganD) still have a tumblr?

Tagged: phantom of the operapoto

15th September 2014

Post reblogged from that mixture of love, pride, and delicacy. with 29 notes

In the case of recent Robbie vs Claudio debates: Redeemable or no?

sheonlysmilesilaugh:

iwillbealoverofwords:

sheonlysmilesilaugh:

iwillbealoverofwords:

Not to get on my high horse, but I’m going to.

Neither of the boys are redeemable.Excellent cases have been made for Robbie, and I’m going to elaborate, and also make a point as to why Claudio also does not deserve Hero.

Robbie: He lured Meg into a situation where she had no knowledge and because of that no legitimate consent to the scene that played out. Taking away a partners consent and knowledge of an intimate scene is essentially sexual assault. We’ve seen no reparations or apologies between the two. Robbie has apparently made no effort to repair the damage caused, in which he was a major player.

Status: automatic boot, Robbie is not deserving of any lady, most especially Meg.

Claudio: He had many worried about his and Hero’s relationship and never at any point addresses them to her, making their relationship entirely one sided. He took away communication, making their relationship entirely selfish. He then witnesses a scene, and with unsubstantiated proof and total disregard of Hero’s emotions debases, humiliates, and slut shames her in front of everyone they know. He does all of this without ever once asking Hero anything. His intent (as it has been in every adaptation) is to make Hero feel as wounded and humiliated as his ego does. His actions are malicious and done with intent.

Status: automatic boot, stay the hell away from Hero you absolute arse.

Both boys are young yes, but that does not excuse their actions. If they wish to be treated as adults I will judge them as such. Neither deserve Hero or Meg. They hurtle salnderous, and subtle abuse both emotional and mental abuse at their respective partners. That is never excusable.

I would say redeemable is a different thing than should be forgiven and taken back by their respective exes or should be with any girl right now. I don’t care to see a redemption for either of them because I just don’t care about douchebag boys who hurt girls. That’s not a story I’m interested in watching. I’d rather watch Hero and Meg own their lives and move on being the amazing and lovely girls they are. But they are young, and I hope that they can learn from what they’ve done and grow up to be adults who don’t hurt women. In that sense, sure redemption is possible but it would take true introspection and, on Claudio’s part recognition that he did more wrong here than not believe Hero, and it would have nothing to do with getting back together with Hero/Meg. That ship has sailed and neither of those girls needs to give them the time of day ever again. They deserve people in their lives who will respect and trust and treat them well now and always. And who see girls and women as people not possessions/objects.

And I agree with all points you make. I would like to point out that others have been using the word “redeemable” and for ease/as well as lack of confusion, I used the same terminology. I don’t think they are deserving nor redeemable. I hope I never inferred that I saw the girls as objects. God knows I don’t, I am an absolute feminist. Just clarifying a few things.

Noooo, I was saying Claudio and Robbie do! Claudio’s possessiveness is v much about feelings of ownership re: Hero even before they get together. And Robbie uses Meg as a tool and doesn’t really care about Hero at all. I wasn’t really disagreeing with you just expanding on my pov re: the word redemption which you are correct has frequently been used in this way by fandom. I was just using your post to say that I think they are different concepts. And like I said though theoretically I think they could have growth arcs that would redeem them, I don’t care to watch that story.

ok I was just double checking :) sometimes my tone doesn’t translate well over text

Source: iwillbealoverofwords

15th September 2014

Post reblogged from that mixture of love, pride, and delicacy. with 29 notes

In the case of recent Robbie vs Claudio debates: Redeemable or no?

sheonlysmilesilaugh:

iwillbealoverofwords:

Not to get on my high horse, but I’m going to.

Neither of the boys are redeemable.Excellent cases have been made for Robbie, and I’m going to elaborate, and also make a point as to why Claudio also does not deserve Hero.

Robbie: He lured Meg into a situation where she had no knowledge and because of that no legitimate consent to the scene that played out. Taking away a partners consent and knowledge of an intimate scene is essentially sexual assault. We’ve seen no reparations or apologies between the two. Robbie has apparently made no effort to repair the damage caused, in which he was a major player.

Status: automatic boot, Robbie is not deserving of any lady, most especially Meg.

Claudio: He had many worried about his and Hero’s relationship and never at any point addresses them to her, making their relationship entirely one sided. He took away communication, making their relationship entirely selfish. He then witnesses a scene, and with unsubstantiated proof and total disregard of Hero’s emotions debases, humiliates, and slut shames her in front of everyone they know. He does all of this without ever once asking Hero anything. His intent (as it has been in every adaptation) is to make Hero feel as wounded and humiliated as his ego does. His actions are malicious and done with intent.

Status: automatic boot, stay the hell away from Hero you absolute arse.

Both boys are young yes, but that does not excuse their actions. If they wish to be treated as adults I will judge them as such. Neither deserve Hero or Meg. They hurtle salnderous, and subtle abuse both emotional and mental abuse at their respective partners. That is never excusable.

I would say redeemable is a different thing than should be forgiven and taken back by their respective exes or should be with any girl right now. I don’t care to see a redemption for either of them because I just don’t care about douchebag boys who hurt girls. That’s not a story I’m interested in watching. I’d rather watch Hero and Meg own their lives and move on being the amazing and lovely girls they are. But they are young, and I hope that they can learn from what they’ve done and grow up to be adults who don’t hurt women. In that sense, sure redemption is possible but it would take true introspection and, on Claudio’s part recognition that he did more wrong here than not believe Hero, and it would have nothing to do with getting back together with Hero/Meg. That ship has sailed and neither of those girls needs to give them the time of day ever again. They deserve people in their lives who will respect and trust and treat them well now and always. And who see girls and women as people not possessions/objects.

And I agree with all points you make. I would like to point out that others have been using the word “redeemable” and for ease/as well as lack of confusion, I used the same terminology. I don’t think they are deserving nor redeemable. I hope I never inferred that I saw the girls as objects. God knows I don’t, I am an absolute feminist. Just clarifying a few things.

Source: iwillbealoverofwords